Monday 28 September 2015

My Enemies Enemy is my Friend - Oops, we got it wrong again!

How stupid are Westminster and Capitol Hill looking today? After years of denouncing Russia and Vladimir Putin we now find that we will have to swallow our pride and our outrageous propaganda and cosy up to the Russians in the hope they will deal with ISIS on our behalf because we have neither the wit nor the means to do so ourselves. This crisis starkly witnesses to the complete bankruptcy of British and American foreign policy and our vile relationship with Saudi Arabia. We are now faced with the most common choice politics confronts us with, the choice between bad and worse. Do we continue futilely attempting to depose of Assad in Syria or do we confront the monster of our own making in ISIS?

The Russians have no doubts and we have belatedly come to the conclusion that they are right. History will show us that the decision to depose Saddam and attack Iraq was one of the worst decisions ever made by supposedly rational governments. It will also show that this decision was made by an imbecile and a madman and that the entire British and American establishments were fully supportive of Braindead George and Mad Tony. The Americans and the British love war and love to kill people, its as simple as that and we were unfortunate enough to have two leaders at the same time who were prepared to indulge our fantasies and lull us into believing we had the moral high ground through bare faced lies that we were happy to believe despite the fact that we knew we were being lied to. Make no mistake, the rise of ISIS and the dreadful refugee crisis we are witnessing lie fully at our own doors and are the result of British and American foreign policy and our complete refusal to hold the Saudis to account for their support of these barbarians. Do you never wonder why none of the richest countries in the world have taken even one refugee, despite that fact that most of them are Muslim and that the two holiest Muslim sites on earth are both in Saudi Arabia?

I have been writing to you for some time about our wrong policies towards both Russia and Iran. British foreign policy is not only wrong it is stupid and is now being empirically demonstrated as such. Our approach towards Iran is not simply that Iranians are mostly Shia, it is fundamentally because they are not Arabs, and that whilst we pose as anti-dictator, we cosy up to the most dictatorial regimes imaginable and only oppose those dictatorships that resist our attempts at Anglo-American domination. I trust you have noticed how the Ukraine and Crimea have quietly slipped off the front pages and out of the news. We need the Russians. Our government has been telling us for years now how Assad is a vile murdering psychopath, but he is about to become our vile murdering psychopath. You have been warned.

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat

Sunday 27 September 2015

Westminster leads by example in degrading workers

With the exception of the SNP who have not yet had time to be corrupted by Westminster, if a Westminster politician's mouth is moving she/he is lying. For example, one of the Tories lies in justification of scrapping the Human Rights Act was that the EU ruled that prisoners in British jails must be allowed to vote. That is not true. What the Court ruled was that the Tory proposed blanket ban on all prisoners voting was too severe and harsh. You see, you don't cease to be a citizen (or in the British case a subject) because you are sent to jail. Should you lose your right to vote because you are sent to jail for failing to pay a fine, or stealing a bottle of water from a supermarket? What the Court argued was that distinctions should be made between crimes and their sentences in deciding who should and should not be allowed to vote. That is the sensible thing to do, but of course common sense and humanity have no meaning in the Westminster universe.

In addition, the Tories told us that the EU Court had prevented Britain from expelling people who were a threat to British society and forced us to harbour terrorists, which again is not true. What the Court did was prevent Britain from sending people to countries where it is certain they would be tortured. You don't uphold the law by sending people to be tortured, you uphold the law by preventing it. The British however, are in favour of torture, just like the Americans, only in Britain's case we prefer it if others do it for us because torture is really not cricket is it, it's something Johnny Foreigner does isn't it?

All this discussion highlights the fact that Britain no longer adheres to the fundamental concept of a civilised society, one which is governed by the Rule of Law. The only law a Tory is prepared to recognise is one which she/he agrees with. In 1885 Albert Dicey defined the rule of law by three fundamental concepts 

a) No one may be punished for any offence, nor suffer any form of penalty for a breach of the law unless it is proven in open court. That means that there can be no arbitrary power exercised by any official persons or bodies over individual citizens.

b) All persons are equal before the law, regardless of economic, social and political status. There are no class distinctions and no one is above the law

c) The rule of law includes the benefits and freedoms conferred on individuals by judicial decisions when determining individual and collective rights from the ordinary law of the land.

As is apparent Britain is in continual breach of every one of these three fundamental principles. The Rule of Law constitutes the basis of all political and constitutional morality and, as the ethical judgment of political behaviour depends on how that behaviour meets the moral criteria embedded within this concept, we can safely conclude that British government and the Westminster political system are both unethical and unlawful in a great many of their actions, particularly in the mysterious concept they call 'the war on terror' and of course in the Tory lexicon that includes trades unions.  Dicey's description of the Rule of Law was the standard of British life until it was updated in 2006 by Lord Thomas Bingham who was a scathing critic of all who would oppose the European Convention on Human Rights, asking which of the convention rights they would discard and writing "would you rather live in a country in which these rights were not protected by law?" Under Bingham's judgement he declared that Britain's invasion of Iraq in 2003 was unlawful arguing that "the rule of law requires compliance by the state with its obligations in international law as in national law."

I repeat without apology, the real target of the Tories are the trades unions and working people who dare to claim any rights at work or employment protection. I recently discovered that a clause in the employment contracts of people who are employed by the Westminster Parliament, for example, someone working for an MP, declares that these contracts are non-contractual. Seriously, Westminster gives a contract of employment to people in which there is a clause declaring the contract non-contractual meaning that any breach of that contract by their employer, for instance by an MP who employs someone in their office, is non-enforceable. In other words, the Mother of Parliaments has declared that its members can do anything they like to their employees and there is nothing they can do about it. And you all thought that I was off my head by insisting that Westminster is hell bent on reducing workers to a slave like status. You have been warned.

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat

Thursday 24 September 2015

Scotland will protect your human rights

As some of you will know I have a particular interest in human rights having written a book about it. This week the First Minister of Scotland told us that she would do whatever she could to halt the Tories assault on our rights saying that it was inconceivable that the Scottish Parliament would give its consent to amend or abolish the Human Rights Act and replace it with a British Bill of Rights. This is wonderful news as it is essential that people in positions of authority and influence expose the British elite's plans for what they truly are, as this plan by the Tories would mark the end of Britain as a civilised society. You know that in my opinion the beginnings of the end of civilisation was the sale of council housing. Since that beginning Britain has been slowly descending into barbarism as expressed through vicious class and ethnic warfare. I will remind you again, all the Tories arguments about human rights are a smokescreen to hide their main goal in this programme of systematically abandoning rights and that is the removal of every and all employment rights. That is their holy grail. Again I warn you, they will not cease until they have imposed a form of slavery on all British workers. But they also have other goals, goals which will require them to impose a totalitarian form of control over British civil and political life. To achieve these they have to destroy organised resistance to their goals, and in the case of a British Bill of Rights, their chief target is the judiciary.

We are all familiar with the fact that the Tories, and most of the Labour Party, in other words, the elite gang of Westminster criminals, are in both political and economic terms, neoliberals. That means that they espouse an aggressive individualism and despise anything that smacks of collectivism which they endlessly propagandise as socialism. As they are liberals in the classical sense of the word, they only accept one form of right. There are two forms of right, negative and positive, and the neoliberal will only accept the negative as they argue that positive rights are not rights but privileges. Britain is a very exclusionary society in that the British elite spend as much of their energy excluding people from any meaningful participation in society as they do on anything else. If you are not, what Thatcher called 'one of us', then you will not be successful in any meaningful way in this country unless you are very lucky. I trust you will be now aware of how David Cameron and his friends at university held parties in pubs and clubs where they would stand on the tables and shout f..k the plebs! That has been revealed in all of our national papers and media this week, with the notable exception of, you guessed, the BBC, what a surprise. So you know this is not a piece of Doktor Kommirat propaganda. However, I trust by now you will accept that I do not do propaganda. Despite its faults and the inherent establishment bias of some of its presenters Channel Four News is probably the best news programme in Europe, but, surprise surprise, the government has revealed plans to privatise it. So much for the independence of Independent Television News. They are also waging war against the medical profession who are threatening strike action over the quite bizarre terms of their proposed contracts. Westminster will not cease until they control everybody and everything on their exclusive terms, and, although I fully support their struggle, I must confess little sympathy for anyone in ITV or the medical profession who were amongst the loudest cheerleaders for the destruction of the miners, steelworkers and the general trades union movement. As they say, what goes around comes around.

My point is that the Tories and their allies in Labour do not believe that ordinary people have rights. All you are entitled to is what they are prepared to give you, and if they deem it necessary, they will remove it at a whim. The Tories are following a well travelled and quite successful trail of establishing an authoritarian society, to be followed by a totalitarian one. The methods they are using and the targets they aim at will be familiar to all who study politics and history. I do not want this post to be too long, so I will follow it up with a post on negative and positive rights and why we will, if we are not vigilant and supportive of people like Nicola Sturgeon, Shami Chakrabarti and Jeremy Corbyn, lose all our employment rights, all forms of social housing, all forms of national health care, free education etc. Make no mistake, we face a dystopian future unless we challenge the dominant narrative. You have been warned.

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat.

Thursday 17 September 2015

God Save the Queen?

The quite hysterical reaction to the news that Jeremy Corbyn did not sing along happily to the national anthem tells you much that you need to know about the state of modern Britain. I cannot conceive of a situation where I would sing this awful composition either. I have nothing against the Queen personally, but I have a lot of problems with the institution of monarchy, and, if I believed in a god, I can assure you that if I was asking this entity to save anything and grant it long life it would be me and my family, not our gracious queen.

I have spent years responding to people who repeatedly tell me that the queen is a wonderful person by asking them how long they have known her? When they ask me what I mean by that I tell them that if they call the queen a wonderful person they must be personally acquainted with her, otherwise how do they know she is wonderful? If they don't know her personally then they are merely regurgitating what the powers that be tell them through an endless diet of propaganda and that they should ask themselves why they are constantly being told that. Now, the queen may well be a wonderful person, but there is no way of knowing that unless you have personally experienced it.

However, even given that she is a wonderful person, it is not her I object to but the system that she represents, maintains and is the figurehead for, a system of plunderers and parasites, a system that is too abominably filthy to be cleansed, and I am sure that my sentiments are very similar to those of Jeremy Corbyn and that he does not sing the national anthem for similar reasons. In addition, I have a problem with a song that contains the sentiments in its sixth verse

Lord grant that Marshal Wade
May by thy mighty aid
Victory bring
May he sedition hush
And like a torrent rush
Rebellious Scots to crush
God save the Queen

The recent remarks by the Tories that the Scots are becoming a threat to national security are quite likely to lead to calls that the Scots are indeed seditious and in need of a modern General Wade to crush them. Until the monarch officially orders the removal of such sentiments and that the national anthem be purged of them, I will not sing this abominable composition either, despite the fact that it is traditional to sing only the first verse. To the good patriotic citizens who express righteous indignation at people like Jeremy Corbyn and me, I can only tell you that you fall into the category of useful idiots.

I have written before that, in a country that openly despises people on social security and spews bile daily on what they call welfare scroungers and skivers, the biggest recipients of social security by a very long way are the royal family. If you want to have a go at a dysfunctional family dependent of welfare, look no further than the royals, their entire existence is totally dependent on public welfare, or, in the case of the Crown Estates, legalised theft. I will return to this theme later. You have been warned

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat

Tuesday 15 September 2015

Britain is intellectually sterile

One of the things that is so depressing about modern Britain is the absence of any real intellectual debate. For example, the charge that Labour under Jeremy Corbyn lacks any economic credibility is only valid if you accept that the dominant neoliberal free market narrative is credible. As I have written before, the claim that there is no alternative is simply stupid and makes no sense. If there is no alternative to something then that something must be true and without flaw. In other words, it must be an absolute, and there is no such thing as an absolute. Indeed the only absolute is that everything is relative (August Comte said that).

I repeat, the claim that there is no alternative is the foundation of totalitarianism. If there is no alternative to the free market economic model then that model must be true, correct in its application and the complete explanation of human economic behaviour. Empirical reality demonstrates that the free market model is useless, anti-social, exclusionary and divisive. It is only of use if you wish to embark on a criminal enterprise to loot as much of the national treasury as possible whilst impoverishing the rest of society and creating obscene levels of inequality.

I was reminded today, by an article in the National newspaper, of Winston Churchill's response to a question on the trades unions. I trust the National will not object if I reproduce this piece to save me searching for it through an interminable mountain of notes. Speaking to the Tory Conference in 1947, Churchill told them

The trade unions are a long-established and essential part of our national life. We take our stand by these pillars of our British society as it has gradually developed and evolved itself, of the right of labouring men to adjust their wages and conditions by collective bargaining, including the right to strike 

I trust the modern fascist, masquerading as a Conservative, reads this and feels genuine shame (although I know that this is absurd as I write it because a sociopath does not have the capacity for shame). Churchill was a full-blooded aristocratic Tory who was no friend whatsoever of trade unions and working people, but even he recognised the essential (his words) need for the union movement. I say that these people who make up the Tories today are masquerading as Conservatives, because they in fact seek to conserve nothing and are hell bent on destroying the society we call Britain. That is their quest, the quest begun by Thatcher. In order to destroy our society she had first to deny its existence, hence the famous 'no such thing as society' dogma. Even under Churchill, Britain was a collectivist semi-civilised society but the modern barbarian Tory will not tolerate any form of collectivism unless it is the collectivism of their class interests. In its present form, the United Kingdom cannot survive because despite plenty of alternatives  available, Britain is too intellectually bankrupt to even consider a mature debate. A feral and rabid free market press and media will soon destroy any real options. You have been warned

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat 

Monday 14 September 2015

Think talk of fascism is scaremongering? Think Again

The British people should really waken up to the growing threat of fascism. Although he didn't use the word, David Davis a Conservative MP and a leading contender for the Tory leadership in 2005 likened parts of the Trade Union Bill as fascist, asking the question

What is this? This isn’t Franco’s Britain, this is Queen Elizabeth II’s Britain.”

This is a reference to the fascist government of General Franco in Spain who hammered the trade unions and all opposition to his dictatorship. I will keep saying it, the Tory government will not cease until the British people have lost all of their human rights and workers are reduced to a state of slavery. I don't know how much evidence the people of this country need but they seem incapable of seeing what is happening daily in front of their eyes and here we have a Tory MP actually warning about the threats to our human rights that I have been writing about for years. I never ever expected to find an ally in the Tory Party and if the British people want further evidence they only need to read the response of the British press to the victory of Jeremy Corbyn in the Labour leadership election. It is genuinely alarming as they have descended into the gutter with outrageous propaganda and downright lies. The Tories now shamelessly circulate a persistent narrative of lies and disinformation on every aspect of political life and they are supported by a press that exhibits a complete disregard for truth and decency. The Tories and their puppets in the press and media now resemble some of the worst aspects of Nazi propaganda as led by Goebbels and Der Sturmer. I genuinely consider the situation in the UK as approaching the serious as some of the propaganda surrounding Jeremy Corbyn, the SNP, the refugee crisis, trades unions and people on benefits is getting hysterical and has no foundation in any kind of reality.

David Davis finds much in the Trade Union Bill that he can support. I don't, it is a genuine abomination, but despite his realisation of the dangers of this legislation he is still a Tory with a visceral hatred of working people. However, credit where it is due as he realises that the identification of pickets to the police and the requirement for them to wear armbands is straight out of Hitler's playbook. That is not hyperbole by the way, that was a requirements for Jews in Hitler's Germany. All tyrannies neutralise unions as they are a fundamental part of a democratic and free society, indeed one of the building blocks of the new post-war Germany was the establishment of a powerful trade union movement into the fabric of German political and social life. But unions are a constraint on governments being able to do what they want unhindered by opposition and today's Tories are determined to get their own way on everything. There are genuine fascists in British government today and you have to waken up and recognise that. If Duncan-Smith does not alert you to this fact then you are genuinely blind. You have been warned.

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat

Sunday 13 September 2015

Remember Pastor Niemoller!

I wrote five days ago about the threat we are now facing from our own government and their willingness to kill their own people without due process of law. The following is from an article in today's Independent by Patrick Cockburn

But the drone attack should cause real alarm because it is an extraordinary extension of the powers of government to be able to execute its own citizens with no explanation, except that the killing was for the public good and against an unnamed but horrendous threat, the nature of which is known only to the government itself. Keep in mind that the ability to execute its own citizens has been a mark of tyrannical government from Rome in the days of the Caesars to Moscow during the Great Purge in the 1930s. Where evidence for an existential threat is lacking, it can be exaggerated or manufactured, as notoriously happened in 2003 over Iraqi WMD.

Remember where you heard it first! You would all be wise to keep an eye on what your government's, both in Britain and the US, are quietly doing to the law and civil liberties. Remember, Hitler had the fanatical support of the majority of the German people for his atrocities, and also remember the words of Pastor Niemoller who, writing about his attitude towards the Nazis said

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me

He had good reason to reflect on his indifference to the fate of other people as he found himself spending seven years in a concentration camp. Does anyone doubt that today's Tories would hesitate to incarcerate their enemies in camps if they could get away with it? Indeed, that is coming, and as with the targeted assassination of their own citizens, it will begin on the excuse of national security. If you think I am losing the plot and getting paranoid, what do you call Guantanamo if it is not a concentration camp, and don't forget, the Westminster establishment is fascinated by all things American. The Tories are already telling us that the election of Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader threatens our national security and they persistently told us that about the SNP during the referendum. The beginning of totalitarianism includes the demonization of other people and the British are embracing such demonization with a gusto, trades unionists, socialists, the disabled, the disadvantaged, the scroungers and skivers, Muslims, the SNP etc. If you want to get into the mentality of Westminster, ponder for a second on the Parliamentary Labour Party's response to Jeremy Corbyn. These people actually had a meeting where they took a decision to respect the result of the ballot. Isn't that nice of them? We should all be eternally grateful to these paragons of the democratic process that they actually considered whether or not they would be bound by the decision of the members of their party. If that is not a totalitarian mindset then what on earth is it? I mean who on earth do these people think they are? Well I know and I have been warning you for a long time now.

In the same spirit, I wonder if any of you have ever noticed one of our government ministers a certain Justine Greening, and had a good look at her? I have been watching her for some time and I have come to the conclusion that she is most definitely not wired properly. I do not wish to be unkind but the said lady is definitely scary. She has the same look I identified in Mad Tony all those years ago. You have been warned.

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat

Tuesday 8 September 2015

You don't defeat terrorism by becoming a terrorist

Britain is becoming a terrorist state. With the targeted assassination of two British citizens in Syria by a drone strike, Britain is following the terrorist lead of the United States in thinking that they can do whatever they like, whenever they like, to whoever they like. I trust someone somewhere has considered the consequences of such action. This government better hope that Isis does not acquire drone technology.

Yesterday in Parliament the Prime Minister told Parliament that he had personally authorised these assassinations. Now, regardless of the guilt or otherwise of these two people, in a country that claims to be governed by the rule of law, such people are innocent until proven guilty. Cameron refused to disclose the information he claimed made this action necessary, which of course means he was lying through his teeth, which is the default position of any British or American politician as they almost certainly have no proof or they would have been glad to show us. Having assassinated British citizens on foreign soil, they have taken a crucial step that may well lead to the assassination of British citizens here at home, an action I am convinced they have taken before with the deaths of both David Kelly and Princess Diana. What is most worrying about this is that they are guilty of the assassination of two British citizens without providing a shred of proof as to why they should have done this. British government seems to think that they have some kind of right to do such things without the tedious business of explaining their actions to the people who elect them, pay their wages, pensions, expenses etc. and the people who will have to live with the consequences of such action. Importantly they have refused to explain to the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which, under British constitutional law is sovereign, which means that Parliament is supposedly superior in authority to the government and not the other way round. The first step on the road to totalitarianism is the destruction of the Rule of Law, and that is exactly what has happened this week in the UK. We must see the justification for these actions because this government are pathological liars. If ever there was a case for a motion of no confidence in the government this is it, and yet our Parliament sits with its thumb in its mouth, impotent and hopeless.

What Parliament and the British people are being required to do by this gang of criminals is take the word of the intelligence services who assured us that without any doubt, Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. If there is one thing we can be sure of is that the intelligence services are as criminal as the Westminster lot. In addition, we are supposed to take it on trust from  the Attorney General that the basis for the strikes were legal when a former Attorney General assured us that war against Iraq was legal. The office of the British Attorney General is a disgrace, an institution who firmly believes that the law is for other people.

I want to remind you again what a politician is. They are simply people who have been fortunate enough to be elected into Parliament, they are ordinary people and have neither right, nor authority to take such action, particularly when Parliament voted against such measures two years ago. As I have written before, governments do not have rights, only people have rights, and if government wants the right to wage war then they must make a case for it and convince the elected Parliament of that case. I remind you again, the British political class are the people who presided over the financial crisis, who lied and deceived over the Scottish referendum, who have waged war against the poorest and the disadvantaged in this country, who took us into an illegal war in Iraq on a farrago of lies etc. etc. They cannot be trusted on anything. They are systematically undermining the rule of law and have effectively destroyed the United Kingdom as a democratic society. They will almost certainly bring terrorism and war onto the streets of our cities by their arrogance and stupidity. You have been warned.

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat

Monday 7 September 2015

The refugee crisis, caused by the free market, may bring about its demise.

I apologise for the length of this post as I am sure people do not like to have to read a lengthy piece, but events are too profound for levity and typical of the British media, their analysis of the present crisis is, as usual, missing the crucial fundamentals.

The refugee crisis is highlighting one of the fundamental facts about the human being and that is their social nature. Despite thirty years of constant right-wing free market propaganda and the ideological filth spewed out daily by American Republicans, born again Christians and their bleating little lambs in the Westminster Parliament, all preaching the survival of the fittest ideology of free market philosophy, people right across Europe are responding to the refugee crisis with a surprising spontaneity of compassion that is even managing to shame the British Westminster establishment and our quasi-Nazi government who refer to the refugees as a swarm. In the UK we have a piece of human detritus called Katie Hopkins who called the refugees cockroaches and told us that her answer to the refugees crossing the Mediterranean was to send a fleet of gunboats to sink them all. I am quite sure she would have been heartened to see the body of the three year old child washed up on a Turkish beach. It will have gladdened her soul and that of the editorial board of the Sun newspaper that prints her poisonous evil. It is significant that people like her stay well clear of Scotland as they know what kind of reception they will receive if they try such stuff here. But it is equally significant that she is feted as a celebrity in other parts of the UK.

The core ideological belief of the free market, the aggressive and rational individual and the denial of the social nature of the human being, summed up by Thatcher's famous 'there is no such thing as society' is being shown to be the nonsense that I continually tell you it is. I am going to remind you once again what the so-called founder of this pernicious claptrap, Adam Smith, wrote about such things, because whilst Smith was indeed the founder of modern day economics and wrote extensively about markets and human economic behaviour, what he said was very different to what today's intellectual scoundrels and fraudsters write. The core of Adam Smith's philosophy is that the human being is fundamentally motivated by a sympathy for our fellow human beings, and that the human being is undeniably a social being. It is that sympathy that is rearing its head throughout Europe and is even being manifest in the UK.

Thirty years of incessant propaganda has produced, in the UK at least, a selfish greedy and callous majority of the population that hate foreigners and who opinion polls tell us do not want any refugees to darken our shores. However, shining through that cloud of ignorance and hatred is a change looming that is worrying Downing Street and showing them up for the scum that they truly are. As you know I have little time for religion, but I am a great fan of Pope Francis who is exposing our so-called Christian rulers in both Britain and the US for the liars and hypocrites that they are. But most importantly, events are giving the lie to the dominant free market narrative. Human collective sympathy is emerging that even the Daily Mail and the Express are loath to criticise. They are still spouting the Tory narrative and repeating their lies, but they are at least retreating from their usual foreigner hatred and bile. They are trying (unsuccessfully) to appear concerned and charitable whilst seeking excuses to help as little as possible.

A significant minority of British people are at last questioning the Tory narrative and registering their disgust with their approach. More and more of the rest of the UK are looking to Scotland for guidance on a collective and humanitarian response, because England has been largely purged of normal human empathy with the unfortunate. But there are encouraging signs of change. The heartless will counter-attack, make no mistake, but this may be the beginning of the end for the ideology the Pope branded 'the dung of the devil'. Watch this space, you have been warned.

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat

Friday 4 September 2015

You live in a council house? White Trash!!

One of Westminster's persistent lies about immigration is that there is no accommodation available for all the people that are 'swarming' in to the country. However, according to the Empty Homes Agency the latest Government data on vacant dwellings shows over 610,000 empty homes in England with over 200,000 long-term vacant dwellings (that is homes unoccupied for over six months) and in 2015 alone there was a rise of 29% of people becoming homeless due to their rental agreement being terminated. Assuming 2.4 people per family, that is enough accommodation for 1,464,000 people and that is only in England. Many of these empty homes are former council houses.

My very first reaction, back at the end of the 1970's, to the announcement that Thatcher's Tories were going to sell council houses was horror. My next reaction was a cold rage that pervaded my soul and solidified my hatred for all things British Conservative that has never weakened. That was when I realised that the suspicion that I had harboured that the Tories were indeed fundamentally evil was in fact a reality. This was a policy that was bred out of pure spite and malice and was one of the most purely political policy decisions that any British government had ever taken. There was nothing remotely economic or social about this policy, it was pure class warfare.

I know it may sound puerile to say that I predicted everything that would happen as a result of this policy, but I assure you, anyone who knows me will tell you that I predicted the outcomes that have all occurred. It was obvious to me why they had taken this decision, and the outcomes were equally obvious. The financial crash that was one of the direct results of this policy was not obvious to me at that time, but began to become apparent soon after Mad Tony took office and I began telling people that the crash was a racing certainty soon after the beginning of the 21st century.

I have written before in this blog that if I were asked to give one measure that defined Britain maturing as a civilised society I would reply that it was the establishment of council housing. By the same logic, I predicted that the sale of council housing marked the beginning of Britain descending into barbarism. I have been scorned and vilified over the years because of my position on the sale of council housing, but I can now confidently say that I was right and they were all wrong. I live in a council house and am repeatedly met with quite genuine astonishment that I have not purchased it. I have been bombarded over the years by agencies wishing to give me quotes on its value and trying to get me to enter their schemes for its purchase. Were I in a position in government, I would compulsorily re-purchase all council houses at the price the owners paid for them. There would be no market value attached and no-one would be allowed to make a profit from them. Today, forty percent of all council houses sold have been purchased by private landlords who rent them out at a vast profit and it is known that around one quarter of Westminster MPs are amongst these parasitical gangsters.  In this matter I was wrong, because I predicted that this would happen at a much higher percentage than that so I'm surprised that it's not higher than forty percent. I knew this was going to happen because when this odious policy was first introduced I watched people buying their parents and their granny's houses so that they would have them at an inflated profit when their mammy and their granny died with every intention of selling them off for as much as they could. It was certain that the gangsters would move in and exploit this situation and of course that's why Thatcher designed it, so all her mates could make fortunes out of property.

Privatisation has been a disaster, but few have equalled the damage inflicted by the privatisation of council housing. The first financial crash was predicated on a housing crisis and the next one will be exactly the same. This month saw the sale of a former council house in London for over £1million. The concept of a housing market is a fraud so serious and cruel that it is a crime. When the next crash happens, remember these facts. You have been warned.

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat  

Thursday 3 September 2015

Tory humanity - let them eat, if they can find anything.

There can surely be no-one left on this planet who is left in any doubt as to the disgusting creature that is a British Conservative. There can be no greater graphic example of the vile barbarity that is the modern Tory than the present refugee crisis. After the Second World War the Daily Mail described Britain's acceptance of 80,000 Jewish refugees from the Holocaust as 'a disgrace'. That is the Tory mindset and today it is worse. The Mail was, of course, Hitler's greatest cheerleader, and today's Tory, but particularly those disgusting creatures in government, is eerily approaching a form of fascism, as I continually warn you about, both in policy and language.

As I have written about here before, the Tories are motivated by the Objectivist philosophy of Ayn Rand who argues that any form of altruism is evil, that is the word she uses. It is an evil to partake of any act that does not give you any benefit, and of course the Tory can see no benefit whatsoever from helping the poor, the disadvantaged, the homeless or the refugee. There is no profit that they can see and so it has no value, as they operate from a simple value system that is purely monetary. The poor and the disabled deserve to die if they do not, or cannot, help themselves, that is what she writes. These vile creatures call themselves Christian but never fail to pass by the other side of the road if they see anyone in need of aid.

There were literally millions of refugees in Europe in 1945, there were over 2 million in Western Europe alone. All these people were eventually resettled, like the 80,000 Jews who came to Britain, many of whose sons, daughters, grandsons and granddaughters are longstanding members of both the major parties in Britain whilst some sit in the Westminster pigsty. As these poor people were resettled, the world didn't come to an end, the sky didn't fall, the economy didn't crash. They were followed by immigrants from the West Indies, Uganda, Kenya etc. and again, the last time I looked the United Kingdom was still standing, still prosperous.

However, true to form, Westminster's first answer to the Jewish problem in 1945 was to send them back to the death camps they had just been liberated from, and that is Cameron's response today, these people must be returned to whence they came, back to Syria, back to Afghanistan etc. It will be interesting to see how the British public respond to this humanitarian crisis, I suspect the majority will display a quite inhuman response as they are avid readers of the Mail and the Express and display Westminster's hatred of foreigners. I hope I am proven wrong. You have been warned

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat