Don Gordon Corleone

I would like to focus your attention on the profoundly anti-democratic mindset of the modern Westminster politician and highlight how the politics of the UK has become so totally corrupted. It again highlights how Westminster has gone beyond repair and how they are completely contemptuous of the electorate, the common people whom they despise with a passion.

You will be aware how, according to the Tories, if the SNP wins a significant number of seats and forms a deal with Labour this will represent 'the worst nightmare' imaginable for Britain. Now, I ask you to contemplate what exactly the Tories are saying about the Scottish people here. Cameron yesterday announced that such a scenario would result in 'total chaos'. At the same time, Labour are telling us that every vote for the SNP means the greater likelihood of a Tory government, despite the fact that every vote for Labour in Scotland normally means that we get a Tory government. It also tells us that it is still not getting through Labour's consciousness that to the average Scot whether Labour or the Conservatives win the next election we will still get a Tory government because Labour and the Tories are indistinguishable. I was struck recently when watching The Godfather on TV of the similarities between the Mafia and our Westminster politicians, particularly the Labour Party. Alarmed at the influence of the Corleone family, a section of the Mafia decide to strike at them and Don Corleone gets wind of it. However, they are unaware of where the real threat will come from. What they do know is that they have a traitor in their midst and the Don tells his son Michael that the traitor will be the one who brings an offer of conciliatory talks to him. That is what happens and the traitor is revealed as one of their trusted friends who does indeed bring an offer from their enemies. I immediately thought of Gordon Brown with his treacherous 'vow' on the eve of the referendum which we all know was a complete lie and a shameful, and quite deliberate, betrayal of the Scottish people. It was Gordon who brought us the offer and, as I have said before, whilst we have always known that a Tory is the natural enemy of the people, we now know that Labour are no better. They are truly disgusting.

You see both Labour and the Tories are telling us that no matter what the people of Scotland vote, it will matter nothing unless we vote how they want us to vote. Both parties have said that they will ensure that an SNP presence in Parliament will have no influence unless it does what they want it to do. I want you to ask yourself who these people think they are? They quite genuinely think that they are the voice of the Scottish people, and the only legitimate voice. If the Scots are too stupid to vote either Labour or Tory then they will have to suffer the consequences; we cannot have a Parliament under the influence of the drunken barbaric hordes of skivers, shirkers and benefit scroungers who go by the collective title of Scottish.

What the two parties simply refuse to accept is that a vote for the SNP is a rejection of the Westminster model of politics and a rejection of Scottish inferiority and second class status. Many people are voting SNP to gain an independence, whether total or partial, from Westminster and that having achieved that they will then be free to vote for whoever they want in a reformed and remodelled Scottish political system freed from the corruption and arrogance of the Westminster elite. Westminster genuinely believes that elections are 'theirs' they are not for the people. The only choice the people must have is which of the Westminster elite be allowed a term in government. Any other options that lie outside of those elite parameters are invalid and must be negated. You have been warned

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat

  

Surely there can't be more than one Truth?

It is difficult to watch a news or current affairs programme today without some kind of "in-depth" analysis by some so-called expert on the reasons why young British people become involved with and committed to what are always termed extremist organisations. Well they do it for the very same reasons that other people who are generally regarded as normal join different organisations, many of whom, such as UKIP and the Conservative Party, I certainly consider extremist. The reason is ideology.

Ideas are the most powerful things in the world, much more powerful than bombs, guns and other forms of weaponry. It was ideas and the ideologies that such ideas spawned that drove the Nazis and the Soviet regime to murder and eliminate millions of innocent people. It is ideas that drive what is happening today in Guantanamo Bay. To read our press you would think that torture and atrocity are the sole preserve of Islamic movements, but we have the incontrovertible evidence that both us and the Americans are just as capable of atrocity as anyone else. Islamic State is being accused of wanting to rule the whole world, but the Americans have been quite open about the fact that they also mean to do just that for decades now. However, it's all right for America to bomb innocent people, invade other countries, torture and massacre their populace because they are the good guys eh? If anyone wants to know about barbarism I suggest they read about British rule in India.

The thing about ideology is that it usually provides certainty. Your religion furnishes you with the truth, and of course if you have the truth, then the other guy is by definition wrong. So, the Christian has the unvarnished truth and so does the Muslim. What complicates matters is that the Catholic truth is different from the Protestant and the Sunni truth is different from the Shi'ite. Its the same with political ideologies, for example, very few Westminster MPs begin a sentence with anything other than the statement 'the truth is...' and they are always telling us that what they do 'is the right thing to do'. You see if you have the truth then you are absolved from the tiresome necessity of having to think. You are always right, and I am always wrong, simples. That allows you to defend the necessity of having to prevent the other person from opposing you, because anyone opposing the truth must be a baddie, don't they? So it's OK to torture and kill baddies and enemies of the truth, to destroy their homes, their countries, their infrastructure etc. If you are doing this in the cause of truth then you are actually doing the poor misguided creatures a favour. My problem is that when I consider religion and politics, I am faced with about a million truths and I can never decide which one of them is true. Confusing isn't it? I will continue this thought later as this post is getting too big. In the meantime, if you are confronted with some enlightened and blessed soul who wishes to share their truth with you, take my advice, run! You have been warned

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat

Russia might be the Tories enemy, but they are not mine.

I am convinced that Westminster politicians live in a different universe from the rest of us mere mortals. I was intrigued to read how our imbecilic Foreign Secretary, Michael Fallon, thinks that we are getting close to a military confrontation with Russia. Of course when he says 'we' he means NATO, which is of course a shorthand for the United States. At the present moment Russia has an armed forces of around one million personnel, with double that number in reserve. When the Soviet forces invaded Germany in 1944, they did so with over 5 million personnel, despite having lost at least that same number in the previous three years. Such is the Russian capacity if forced to mobilise.

I have written before that the present crisis in the Ukraine was engineered by the USA. Russia's response was entirely predictable, and, as far as I'm concerned wholly justified. It should not be forgotten that in 1990, the NATO countries, including the USA gave Russia a firm promise that NATO would not expand 'another inch' eastwards. This was delivered to President Gorbachev to allow him to agree to the unification of Germany and calm Russian fears that East Germany would be incorporated into the NATO alliance. Like all Western politicians, the NATO ministers who made this promise were lying through their teeth and now NATO's forces, particularly the Americans, have advanced, not only up to Russia's borders, but in the case of Ukraine, into territory that the Russians consider belongs to them. If Ukraine is accepted as a member of the EU and NATO this would be the equivalent of Russia sending troops and nuclear missile batteries into Canada and Mexico.

I have mentioned before that if you watch "The Nazis; a Warning from History" on TV you will learn how the Ukrainians were amongst Hitler's biggest supporters and how most concentration camp guards were either Ukrainians or Lithuanians. The Ukrainians opposing Russia are perfectly free to do so, however, we must never lose sight of the fact that the majority of them are anti-semitic fascists who fought the Russians during WW11 with many of them losing their lives at Stalingrad and therefore being party to the inhumanity and appalling suffering inflicted on that city and its inhabitants. The Russians have long and perfectly understandable memories of their Ukrainian neighbours. Remember, the Soviets lost 25 million people in WW2. The Russians will never forget that. Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, Russia has!

The two greatest military forces in modern European history, Napoleon's Grand Army, and the German Wehrmacht, both came to grief in Russia. Perhaps Mr Hammond feels that the modern British army is a superior force to either of those. My estimation of our Westminster elite is that he is probably mad enough to think that. However, the reality is that the Tories are hiding behind Obama's skirts. Question - Should there be a war with Russia and it became nuclear, would Western Europe escape the effects of such a conflagration. Discuss!

You have been warned

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat.

Don't be taken in by Labour's lies and propaganda

From now until the general election in May the Labour Party are going to bombard you with the propaganda message that a vote for the SNP will mean the return of a Tory government in Westminster and that the only way to avoid this is to vote Labour. That is a complete lie and must be exposed for the lie that it is. Why is that a lie? Because the vote in Scotland is normally immaterial to the result of a Westminster election and it is normal for a resounding vote for Labour in Scotland to result in a Tory victory. Thus, a vote for the SNP will do nothing to jeopardise a Labour victory or encourage a Tory win. I give you  a sample of results from Conservative electoral victories that expose Labour for the liars that they most assuredly are.

In 1959 Labour gained 38 seats in Scotland whilst the Tories gained 31. However the overall result gave the Tories 365 Westminster seats to Labour's 358. This means that if England and Wales vote Labour that is who will win and if they vote Tory then that is who will win regardless of what Scotland votes.

In 1970 Labour gained 44 seats in Scotland whilst the Tories gained 23. However the overall result gave the Tories 322 Westminster seats to Labour's 287

In 1979 Labour gained 44 seats in Scotland whilst the Tories gained 22. However the overall result gave the Tories 339 Westminster seats to Labour's 268

In 1983 Labour gained 41 seats in Scotland whilst the Tories gained 21. However the overall result gave the Tories 397 Westminster seats to Labour's 209

In 1987 Labour gained 50 seats in Scotland whilst the Tories gained 10. However the overall result gave the Tories 375 Westminster seats to Labour's 229

In 1992 Labour gained 49 seats in Scotland whilst the Tories gained 11. However the overall result gave the Tories 336 Westminster seats to Labour's 271

In 2010 Labour gained 41 seats in Scotland whilst the Tories gained 1. However the overall result gave the Tories 306 Westminster seats to Labour's 258
As a result we can see that the success of Labour from 1997 to 2010 owed little or nothing to the Scottish vote. It matters little what Scotland votes because the result reflects the rest of the UK. For example throughout Labours victory years 1997 to 2010, they won 56 seats in Scotland in 1997 to the Tories zero, in 2001 55 seats to the Tories 1 and in 2005 40 seats to the Tories 1. Thus, even whilst their vote fell in Scotland from 56 seats to 40, it had no effect on the UK result, they still won because they won in England and Wales. Thus it matters not if the SNP win in Scotland in May because even when the Labour Party were winning in Scotland, we still returned 7 Conservative governments from  1959 till 2010. These are empirical facts, they are not propaganda and the facts tell us that a vote for Labour in Scotland is just as likely to result in a Conservative victory as a vote for anyone else. Do not fall for Labour's lies; if you vote Labour in Scotland you will probably get another Conservative government. The only way to safeguard Scotland is to vote SNP. If we continually get that then independence is an inevitability and following independence you can vote Labour to your hearts content. Indeed if you are really a dedicated Labour supporter, then a vote for the SNP is the only sensible vote for your long-term interests. You have been warned

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat

 

 

If you support the status quo you are not welcome here

If you are following the news you will be under no illusions as to how completely corrupt the elite in Britain really are. Two Foreign Secretaries and the head of HSBC have been exposed as being completely without any form of moral compass. Westminster is like a high class brothel where its personnel are willing to sell their bodies for immoral services, but only to the rich and wealthy. The difference is that a brothel is not necessarily immoral and the personnel in a brothel are offering an honest personal service that gives satisfaction. and does no harm to any other person. What the politicians are doing is selling their services fraudulently, deceiving the public, defrauding the people who elected them. This is a good example of legalised criminality. We actually had a serving MP who has an income of some £80,000 per annum from the public purse telling the programme that he was self-employed and had no income. One of the excuses given by the politicians is that MPs are not paid enough. Therefore, in an era when people in full-time work are using foodbanks we are being seriously told that £70,000 per annum is not enough to live on by the same politicians who will try to convince us that social security payments are far too generous, that the financial health of the nation is in jeopardy because of welfare and that we need to protect bankers bonuses and pay incompetents millions of pounds a year and benefits will have to be cut if we are to regain financial security as a nation.

You are probably fed up with hearing me tell you that Westminster is beyond repair. If anyone can seriously advance an argument to the contrary with daily news like this then I will be fascinated to hear it. One of the things I seriously ask anyone reading this to consider is to ask yourself how these people will behave if we leave the European Union and lose the regulatory mechanisms that exist under European institutions. Westminster politicians are genuinely disgusting. It is a moral necessity to get rid of them. The only way we can get shot of them is to vote for an independent Scotland and then ensure that the mechanisms are in place to ensure that such things do not happen here.

One of the things that the Scots need to do is to get control of the decision-making that affects the NHS. There is no doubt that the NHS is being progressively privatised by stealth and unfortunately that appears to be happening in Scotland. Any politician of whatever party who is exposed as supporting measures to privatise or to 'outsource' any of its functions must be named, shamed and removed from office. Privatisation of health means people will die, its as simple as that. A privatised health service is based exclusively on private insurance and private insurers will not insure the poor, the unemployed, the disabled and those with a chronic illness.  Such people are simply left to die. If that is the kind of nation you want to live in then I ask you to never read this blog again, you are not welcome. You have been warned

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat    

Are you a useless eater?

It seems that I was somewhat misinformed when I told you in my last post that the government was going to introduce a luxury tax on female sanitary products, because that tax is already in place. I apologise as I was unaware of such a tax. My ignorance does nothing however, to lessen the shocking revelation that Westminster could even consider such a measure let alone implement it. I fail to understand how a woman's period can be considered a luxury? It does, however, tell us a great deal about the mentality of the female members of the Westminster mafia that they support such measures.

There is an excellent programme on the documentary channels on television entitled "The Nazis: a Warning From History!" This programme is the outcome of an excellent book by the same title which I have in my collection. I recommend it. What worries me is that whilst we can sit and watch a programme we can also completely fail to heed the warning contained within as the rise of fascism in the world, typified by the demonisation of peoples and minorities, is genuinely alarming. We are witnessing this phenomenon within the UK. It is not just in the increasing attacks on Jewish people and Judaism, but in the same attacks, probably by the same people, on Muslims. Not all Jews agree with the policies and strategies of the Israeli state, just as all Muslims do not agree with the policies and strategies of Isis or Al-Qaeda. In such an environment that is developing, begins the process of demonising and dehumanisation of such minorities. If you can successfully characterise Jews and Muslims as being somehow subhuman then it is obvious that you are superior and have rights that should not be extended to such inferior minorities. It is a grave error to suppose that the Holocaust, Auschwitz, Dachau etc. could not happen again. I ask you to consider Guantanamo Bay.

On the same theme, we see the increasing demonisation of the poor, people on benefits, the unemployed and the disabled in this country. Westminster increasingly portrays such people as scroungers, skivers, the undeserving etc. Such people are increasingly being portrayed by this government and its odious supporters in the right wing media as undesirable. The Nazis had a habit of referring to the unfortunates within their society as 'useless eaters' and 'untermenschen', lesser people, and it is only a matter of time before a Tory uses the same language. David Cameron is a genuinely dangerous man, a real wolf in sheep's clothing who panders to all the lower instincts within humans. Westminster is supposed to be driven by a concern for the well-being and care of the nation. This Westminster and its personnel are driven by hate and contempt for the majority of the British people. You have been warned 

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat 

In Britain sanitary products are luxury items

The word democracy comes from the Greek demos (the people) and kritas (rule). Now, if we claim to be democratic then it is permissible for people like us to examine what democracy is, or should be. In my last post I noted how the Greeks claimed to be ruled by law. Aristotle wrote that

"It is more proper that law should govern than any one of its citizens: upon the same principle, if it is advantageous to place the supreme power in some particular persons, they should be appointed to be only guardians, and the servants of the laws".

To return to Pericles, he told us that;

"Our polity....is called a democracy, because not the few but the many govern. If we look to the laws, they afford equal justice to all in their private differences; if to social standing, advancement in public life falls to reputation for capacity, class considerations not being allowed to interfere with merit; nor again does poverty bar the way, if a man is able to serve the state, he is not hindered by obscurity. Where the law is subject to some other authority and has none of its own, the collapse of the state, in my view, is not far off; but if the law is master of the government and the government its slave, then the situation is full of promise and men enjoy all the blessings that the gods shower on a state".

If we take such ideals as the starting point for our investigations then we can only conclude that Britain is indeed a barbarian state. I wrote how politics is a decision-making process. Today we read that the average Scottish wage has fallen by £1900 since this government was elected in 2010. At the same time, a CEO in one of our major companies earns the average working annual salary every 2 days. That situation is the result of deliberate political policy decisions. Such situations don't happen spontaneously or by the workings of the 'market' despite what politicians consistently tell you. British politicians took the conscious decision in the late 1970's to erect an economic system that would quite deliberately transfer wealth from the poor to the rich and to strip as many rights from workers as possible to remove the constraints on such an economic policy.

What gives Westminster politicians the right to make such decisions that have such consequences for people? They cannot claim that they have a mandate from the electorate. No government in Britain has been elected with more than 42% of the vote since the 1950's. Today we see the news that the government is going to impose a 'luxury' tax on female sanitary products. Thus, tampons are now a luxury. I am sure that some people reading this will be sure that I am making this up because it smacks of genuine insanity. The word government comes from the Latin word gubernare, to govern. The Latin in its turn takes the word gubernare from the Greek kubernetes. In Greek a kubernetes was the pilot of a ship, the steersman or the helmsman. So government is the art of steering, of guiding and governing the ship of state. These Greek and Latin roots were translated into the English as governor, or ruler. The position we have in Britain today is that the government not only steers the ship but determines its course, its speed and its ultimate destination. This is not the function of government. I will return to this again.

Your Servant
Doktor Kommirat.